Cpx24.com CPM Program

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011

justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. justin bieber twitter
  • justin bieber twitter



  • rxse7en
    Nov 29, 03:25 PM
    Ws there any mention of iTV's HD capabilities?





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. Justin+ieber+twitter+
  • Justin+ieber+twitter+



  • tipdrill407
    Jul 13, 10:53 PM
    Put it in the Core 2 Duo Macbook Pro 17" and I'm all over it. Would still like to see if HD-DVD prevails.

    Now, I have a plasma hdtv that'll "do" 1080i and a dvd player that can output and upscale (if needed) to 1080i--can I burn 1080i sources and play the BR disk in my dvd player OR will I also need a BR player to view HD video? 25gb per side is a nice chunk o' storage though.

    B

    You'll neet a blu ray player. A non blu-ray dvd player does not have the correct laser to read a blu ray disc.





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. Justin Bieber Twitter
  • Justin Bieber Twitter



  • babul
    Feb 25, 10:08 PM
    Here i'll show you my mac setup and my bedroom studio setup

    Nothin much, iPad on the left. JBL iPod Dock, Crappy speakers
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v318/kitiks/mac1-1.jpg

    This tower connected to the TV, so i can make beats on the big screen
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v318/kitiks/mac2.jpg

    17" Samsung Monitor, Macbook Pro 17" (First Model), Macbook Pro 13" Unibody, iTouch 1st Gen and 2nd Gen plugged on the right.
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v318/kitiks/mac3.jpg

    Another Towers with Dual 17" Samsung
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v318/kitiks/mac4.jpg

    My Main Workstation, 27" iMac. iPhone 3GS plugged on the right
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v318/kitiks/mac5.jpg

    And I just got this 15" Macbook Pro Unibody
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v318/kitiks/mac6.jpg

    I love to work in low ambient light. So here is how it looks
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v318/kitiks/mac7.jpg
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v318/kitiks/mac8.jpg





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. justin bieber twitter
  • justin bieber twitter



  • dogzipp
    Apr 1, 08:19 AM
    Somehow I am unable to grab any screen shots. They all end up "blank" (or black in this case). Has anybody had any problems? I suppose not, since I see everyone posting screen shots everywhere...

    I tried changing the format from PNG to JPG with no effect. Tried other screen grab utilities also with no luck (Guess they use the system calls).

    Any ideas? (and please don't say post a screen shots of my problem, hehe)

    Thanks





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. justin bieber backgrounds 2011
  • justin bieber backgrounds 2011



  • pointandclick
    Mar 1, 10:03 PM
    Yep all of them are hard drives, i have 2TB in each one and then a RAID-0 with 2x2TB.

    How are they connected? I've never bothered with external drives. NAS is where it's at. ;) I don't even like to think about trying to transfer terabytes of data over usb. Plus being able to use the storage from multiple machines without having to plug/unplug.
    Just rebuilt mine with 3x2tb in raidz.





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. justin bieber twitter
  • justin bieber twitter



  • wmmk
    Jul 13, 11:02 PM
    Will I be able to get a reasonably priced apple laptop with merom, 802.11n, blueray burner, possibly HD, and leopard (or whatever 10.6 is called) in late 2007 or early 2008?





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. desktop, Justin
  • desktop, Justin



  • HecubusPro
    Aug 25, 11:52 AM
    and whats with all the Prius cars? sheeeeshh.

    ;-)

    I don't know. It's not like I'm a granola-eating-backpacking-through-the-Appalachians hippie. I don't want to save the world. I just want to save gas. :)
    And for some reason, Prius' and Mac Mini's go so darned well together.





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. justin bieber 2011 wallpaper.
  • justin bieber 2011 wallpaper.



  • Small White Car
    Apr 12, 10:14 PM
    You realize that you'll be on Aperture 5 before you spend more money than just buying 3 outright. The upgrade from 2 to 3 cost more than just buying 3 on the app store.

    Why do you want to spend more money?

    If I buy Aperture 3, 4, and 5 on the app store I'll have spent $240.

    Didn't it used to be $300 for 1 version? What did the upgrades cost? I feel like I'll be way past 5 before I break even.

    Available on the App Store?!?

    Seriously, this better come in a box.

    I can't get this approved for use without probably buying it myself first, let alone using my own iTunes account, which brings up a whole lot of licensing issues at work. And before you say "create a iTunes account for work."... Tying the corporate credit card to a shared iTunes account? I'd have a better chance of having our CEO give me one of his Jaguars than that. Not to mention, IT would slaughter me for the amount of bandwidth I'd use in downloading it.

    Yeah, our editing machines aren't even allowed to be on the internet.

    Hopefully there's a way around this.





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. justin bieber twitter
  • justin bieber twitter



  • Giaguara
    Apr 15, 10:30 AM
    What people don't understand is that Apple is dying....

    Yes, I don't really understand WHY according to ... you ?? apple would be dieing.

    If you want a Mac that costs 500 $, buy a second had iMac / eMac.

    I have NEVER seen a petition that has anything to do with computer or software industry, that I could believe would make _really_ any difference. All the petitions I've seen seem rant - like. If you have an idea, just present it in a more constructive manner, bring / ship it to Cupertino.

    Besides - I find it really weird that you don't have more than 500 $ to spend for a computer ... when you are living in Japan. Quit drinking gallons of milk a day there, and you can get a computer in a week. ;)





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. Justin Bieber Backgrounds 2011
  • Justin Bieber Backgrounds 2011



  • Seryph
    Mar 31, 09:44 AM
    Talking about new "features": have you noticed the Fuji wallpaper is different?
    The new one has clouds at the base...

    I'd like to see this too! The old one was pretty bland at the bottom so if this is true I'm glad they changed it.





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. justin bieber backgrounds for
  • justin bieber backgrounds for



  • adroit
    Nov 15, 11:25 AM
    That really depends on the program, on how "parallelizable" the application is.

    The simplest way to think of it is like this: Let's say you have a program that first has to calculate A. Then, when it's done that, it uses the result of A to calculate B. Then, when it's done that, uses the result of B to calculate C, then C to D, and so on. That's a *serial* problem there. The calculation of B can't begin until A is done, so it doesn't matter how many processors you have running, all computation is held up on one spot.

    On the other hand, let's say you have an application that needs to calculate A, B, C and D, but those four values are not dependent on each other at all. In that case, you can use four processors at the same time, to calculate all four values at the same time.

    Think of it like baking a cake. You can't start putting on the icing until the cake is done baking. And you can't start baking the cake until the ingredients are all mixed together. But you can have people simultaneously getting out and measuring the ingredients.

    So that problem is partially parallelizable, but the majority of its workload is a serial process.

    Some software applications, just by their very nature, will never be able to do anything useful with multiple processors.

    This is true, but there are still many many ways to optimize the multi-core processor that's not currently being use.

    For example, I am waiting for a program to compile right now. Although I have a dual core on my computer, the compiler only compile one file at a time and usually takes about 10 min to do a full compile . If I have an 8 core computer with a multi-threaded compiler then I can cut the total time to jsut over a min + couple of seconds for linking time.

    I think the main problem with muti-threading program is that it is difficult to implement, especially for coders who only knows high-level languages. Muti-threading in low-level program such as C is not easy but at least it is straight-forward. But trying to muti-thread high-level language such as VB or C# can get you into a big headace since everything is abstracted from the programmer. To do that, you need to get into unsafe code and call a bunch of DLLs, and it's easy to get memory leaks. Basically it can start to get very complicated, very quickly.





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. Justin Bieber Twitter
  • Justin Bieber Twitter



  • javabear90
    Mar 18, 10:20 PM
    hmmm...... this is a head scratcher....





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. Justin+ieber+ackgrounds+
  • Justin+ieber+ackgrounds+



  • Detlev
    Jul 18, 06:15 AM
    This does play into the news published about the industry allowing people to burn movies to DVDs but can someone do the math? What would the file size be for 2 hour movie at present? What about if it were compressed into a zip or tz file? What would it be if the quality were improved? How long would it take to download these files with dialup, on dsl, on cable. I would think that most people would not be downloading using their offices T1 connection ;)

    How long would you wait or tie up your computer's internet connection to download an old movie from Disney?

    Here is another issue to think about. With large files being downloaded to your HD and then errasing them you will have to defragment your HD quite often or you will suffer. Is there rumor of improved Disk Utility or other method of handling this?





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. justin bieber backgrounds 2011
  • justin bieber backgrounds 2011



  • Mexbearpig
    Nov 25, 02:37 PM
    Our power went out so we went out to get something to eat. I got a vent double chocolate chip frappuccino with a blueberry scone.and now our power is back on!





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. justin bieber backgrounds for
  • justin bieber backgrounds for



  • smithrh
    Apr 11, 03:41 PM
    IMO, if a gearbox has a setting where it will automatically shift gears for you and you don't have to touch it, it's an automatic gearbox.

    Sure, some auto gearboxes (DSG) are better than others (torque converter) but they're still automatic.

    What if it's not actually an automatic?

    Seriously though, I do wonder if people take little things like this (being able to drive a stickshift) and pump up the importance of it, just to get some extremely minor satisfaction out of being "better" than other people.

    Also, google "money shift" for the downside of having "full control."





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. justin bieber twitter
  • justin bieber twitter



  • nagromme
    Jun 22, 04:36 PM
    Oh, you will always be able to run Xcode on a Mac. You'll just have to buy the developer subscription for a few thousand dollars per year in order to get it activated...

    What Apple actions would lead you to believe that would ever happen? I don�t see the logic in such fears.





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. justin bieber 2011 wallpaper
  • justin bieber 2011 wallpaper



  • franswa za
    May 3, 04:55 AM
    took 5 versions of the iphone, 1 version of the ipad and a s-load of developers to get here.

    :d





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. to our Twitter Backgrounds
  • to our Twitter Backgrounds



  • awraisch
    Sep 5, 08:25 AM
    do they usually shut the store down for something as small as a speed bump?





    justin bieber backgrounds for twitter 2011. justin bieber backgrounds for
  • justin bieber backgrounds for



  • imac_japan
    Apr 16, 05:46 AM
    Very interesting point but I want Apple's share to grow ! The whole point of this thread is to get Apple into every home - right now, its being done by the Ipod but sales can't continue this good forever so they must push the Macintosh into more homes and business.





    lOUDsCREAMEr
    Jul 19, 05:40 PM
    I'm about ready to buy a 20" iMac but I want the new OS. How long do I have to wait?

    around six months or less





    aswitcher
    Jan 11, 11:30 PM
    Agreed. It's not just a bad name; it's a sin!

    How about MacBook Zephyr
    MacBook Breeze
    MacBook Frizbee





    SteveKnobs
    Apr 3, 12:56 AM
    ...but all the Apple apologists...so quick to jump to Apple's defense...say that there is no such problem. :D

    You are dead on correct. Many people do not want to endure the wait for a new one if they return it...Many are waiting to see if Apple can resolve the issue in a future production batch. What good is exchanging if the new one is going to have the same, or worse, problem

    I love Apple products but I am always entertained by the rabid zeal of the delusional Apple apologists who insist the company can do no wrong...OR...they simply ignore the common, and obvious, flaws in the Apple product they buy, trying to convince themselves that they have the only "good" one...which on some subconscious level they need to tell themselves so they can believe they are "special" somehow.

    You did a poll asking hundreds of people if they are waiting for this very reason? Dude you're way wrong. The "many" people you are referring to are probably a very select number of....MacRumors members. Hardly indicative of the general population. I don't know if you heard- but people are going mad trying to get their hands on one. Your "theory" or whatever it is about people waiting to make sure the kinks are worked out is, well....stupid. I've read this whole thread and you seem to be on a kick about the light-bleeding issue. Yet you dont own one? Interesting.





    nez
    Jan 11, 07:45 AM
    Hopefully it's not too big an image... e90 m3. i love this this thing to bits.





    seashellz
    Jul 18, 01:25 PM
    1. The reports are coming in that the BR DVD picture is....well, lousy-while the HD picture is said to be primo. You can buy an HD player NOW (and discs-soon)for under $500.
    For all intents and purposes, $1000 Blu Ray players are as scarce as George Bush's IQ numbers-if there are even any to be had at all...

    2. *VERY Important: SONY has yet to produce a single BR disc under the promised new HD Codec 1- the prime reason to buy BR HD in the first place-the ones they are selling now are just 'prototype', being rushed to market so they can say "We were first!" which is like selling a car without spark plugs-youll just have to be patient until some arrive.

    Yes, a "Better Future" is just around the corner, as they like to say defensively-well I say- PRODUCE THEM-then we will believe-other wise, it is VAPORWARE.
    So you are in effect buying v.1 BR discs down at Best Buy-while v.2 discs are still being worked on-possibly to arrive by Christmas.
    Who would buy a BR disc that will be obsolete in a few months-that is-if the Codec 1 discs ever arrive at all-?
    They are having manufacturing problems with these still- [Corpspeak: "we are 'fine tuning' them"] which is the reason for the delay.

    2. SONY JUST GOT KICKED IN THE BALLS #1: (Reuters) a UK high court ruling Friday declared that the the giant SONY/BMG merger is not legal, and must be broken apart, worldwide.
    If this ruling stands, SONY will be sucked dry, in order to either fight this, or to seperate, as they have streamlined and folded the two companies in together so tightly-like two Octopi in battle-or love, that it will drain much time, money and resources from the company to fight the ruling, or to re-separate as two distinct entities should they lose...it could in fact, this SINK SONY.

    Because of this ruling, Warner Bros. have already backed out of a deal to merge with EMI.
    And while spokemen at EMI declared 'This will be no problem,'
    Warner Bros. spokesfolks retorted with-'We wouldnt bet the farm on that if we were you'
    The deal is on HOLD and possibly withdrawn.

    Anyway, this will be a HUGE drain on SONYs already shaky financial structure-they are literally betting the whole company on Blue Ray-hoping it wont become another Betamax. There is also much infighting in the ranks of SONY, according to reports. (also, they themselves admit they have lost 3% marketshare worldwide, since the merger (If thats so, why would they APPEAL the decision?!)

    3. SONY JGKITB #2: Reports are coming from the chip manufacturing plant that for every FIVE PSP-3 chips created, only ONE is usable-SONY still has to pay for the other chips. (Wednesdays Gizmo.com)
    (they are too complex, and they are rushing this whole thing to market too fast)
    What this means is that SONYs expected cash influx from selling these will be nill-in fact, this will bleed the company big time.

    What it will mean for the consumer, is that the PSP-3 may be very hard to find, as there will be supply and distribution problems, if this is not corrected PRONTO.
    SONY was counting on being able to flood the landscape with these in order to better 'push' BR.
    But apparaently not any longer.

    And we all know what it means when a desired product is scarce-much higher prices.

    SONY has alienated much of the CD community with the secret DRM implant from a few months ago.
    They have alienated much of the DVD community with subpar DVD releases of late.
    ie: too many pan and scan releases, or cancelled titles.

    And will they finally decide on flagging these BR discs so the folks with non-upconverting HDMI Monitors (or no HDMI outs at all) will be unable to play their discs in prime mode, if at all?
    If they do-all you thousands of folks with the non-upconverting/compliant "HD" Bigscreen TVs will have to donate them to GOODWILL, and buy a new one.

    While these trial discs dont have the feature yet, the *whole rational* in BRs security architecture was to keep
    people from copying or PLAYING 'unauthorized' discs.

    When SONY finally chooses to implement this essential (in their minds) baseline feature:

    1.You will be unable to download BR movies onto your computer from disc or Internet.
    2.You will need to connect to the internet through your player to get "permission" from a SONY server to play any title-not just SONY-Columbia movies.
    I do not know if HD discs/players have the same feature, but doubt it.

    Aside from the intrusion into your privacy, your player would be shut down via a signal from SONY if you tried to play a 'pirated', a backup disc, or one copied/borrowed from a friend. (It is not clear whether you will be locked out from that title only, or your WHOLE player will be shut down-and become a piece of junk-until the situation is rectified with SONY over an 800 number-remember, however, -thought criminals-er, pirates-you will have no reason to complain-or have recourse-what you did was ILLEGAL, so no amount of whining may save you-or your useless player.
    (While this is still conjecture-it is a likely and very real possibility-as they spent billion on just this sort of feature)
    They WILL NOT be burned by a cracked CSS code and wholesale DVD copying again.

    They are serious about "piracy"-and your friends borrowed copy of a title-maybe even if legit-will shut down your player just as if playing a dubious Chinese-made copy of PIRATES OF THE CARRIBEAN disc bought today.

    I dont think APPLE or anyone, should jump into BR just yet-It is not OUR duty to shore up a flagging, unproven-or any-HD format.

    Let the war of the marketplace and the better player decide, before you buy into another potential Laserdisc or Betamax-whether BR or HD, then make a decision

    It clearly looked for a moment that HD was the underdog, but that has changed overnight.
    While at this point I have a slight bias towards HD for no particular reason,
    I am sitting out ALL HD out until:

    1. ONE format emerges as the clear winner.
    2. Second generation of players and discs are available - a year or two from now-and most of the kinks are worked out.


    No comments:

    Post a Comment